The Oshman Family JCC will devote its Zionism 3.0 Conference to whether Israeli and American Jews are ‘equal shareholders’ in the Jewish future
WASHINGTON — Zack Bodner would like to start a new kind of discussion. Specifically, he’d like his organization, The Oshman Family Jewish Community Center, to be “an incubator for new expressions of Jewish identity” and transform the Jewish community’s collective dialogue about its own future.
That ambition will come to fruition on September 18, when his Palo Alto, California-based JCC will host its second annual Zionism 3.0 Conference, a day-long event that brings a host of diverse speakers and provocative questions about the condition of both the Jewish people and Zionism in the 21st Century.
Bodner, who is CEO of the Oshman Family JCC, inaugurated the confab last year amid the heated — and, at times, bitter — debate over the agreement US President Barack Obama forged to curtail Tehran’s nuclear weapons program.
“We recognized that there was beginning to be a cleavage in the community, really during and after the Iran deal, and we realized that we needed to bring the community together,” he told The Times of Israel on Tuesday. “You need to be able to have an open conversation with people of different opinions, and you need to be able to mend splits.”
While this year’s conference has “no precipitating event like the Iran deal” was for 2015’s gathering, the upcoming summit, which be available to live stream, will focus on Israeli-Diaspora relations.
“The idea behind this conference,” Bodner said, “is whether Israeli and Jewish Americans should see themselves as sharing a collective future and whether we are equal stakeholders in Israel.”
The day-long meeting — of which The Times of Israel is a sponsor — will consist of distinguished speakers like veteran Middle East peace negotiator Dennis Ross and former US ambassador to Israel Daniel Kurtzner.
But it will also include writers who have focused on the meaning of contemporary Zionism and Jewish identity, like Dr. Einat Wilf, author of the book “My Israel: Our Generation,” Times of Israel’s new media editor Sarah Tuttle-Singer and Shalem College’s senior vice president Daniel Gordis; as well as writers and journalists like Yossi Klein Halevi and Times of Israel’s Raphael Ahren and Avi Issacharoff.
The intellectual foundation of Zionism 3.0, Bodner contends, is based off his belief that Zionism is heading into its third phase, and that there is a need to collectively prepare for entering “the next stage.”
‘For the first time in Jewish history, there is both a strong Jewish Diaspora and a strong Jewish homeland’
The first phase was pre-1948 and the foundation of the State of Israel, it centered around the belief of Jewish nationalism and self-determination. The second phase was 1948 to the turn of the century, which entailed some Jews making aliyah, while others who couldn’t make the move sent money to help the nascent Jewish state survive. And the third phase is when Jews in the Diaspora want more of a say about what’s happening in Israel and Israelis want more of a say about what’s happening in the broader Jewish community, according to Bodner.
Thus, the conference — which has a subtitle of “pursuing a shared dream” — is designed to bring together thinkers from both Jewish centers. “For the first time in Jewish history, there is both a strong Jewish Diaspora and a strong Jewish homeland,” Bodner emphasized, “So what does that mean? How do they interact with each other under this new paradigm?”
Palo Alto has one of the largest population of Israeli expatriates in the world, which is part of what makes it a fitting location for such a discussion. Over the last several years, there have been many conferences and panel discussions hosted by American Jewish organizations that focused on the plight of Israel, but there is less focus from Israelis on the plight of American Jewry. Part of the reason for the Northern California confab is to integrate the two discussions.
But while the biggest story in the United States remains the roller coaster of a presidential election season, Bodner has said they will focus little on the heated contest. Acknowledging that Republican nominee Donald Trump — who has ignited passionate reactions from the Jewish community, mostly aghast — is a “sexy topic,” the JCC head wants to focus the conversation more on the conference’s central theme.
Similarly, very little attention will be paid to the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel — as last year’s gathering gave it more time.
Although the Oshman Family JCC made a concerted effort to include multiple, indeed, competing, perspectives in the dialogue — one breakout session will be hosted by AIPAC officials, another by the Israel Policy Forum — they did institute a “tent poll” that precluded BDS-supporters from speaking. “We believe the folks that come here and speak should be folks who believe in a democratic Jewish state of Israel to exist,” Bodner stated.
Nevertheless, he said he wants to facilitate an environment where differences can be discussed openly. “In a lot of places there’s an unwillingness to talk about Israel right now because it seems like a divisive issue, and we’re saying it’s not a divisive issue, it doesn’t have to be a divisive issue,” he said. “You can come from a place of love for Israel, even if you’re not in agreement.”
“We want to be a launching pad for these conversations that will drive the Jews and Zionism’s collective future,” he added.
A Sa’ar 4.5-class Corvette of the Israeli Navy fires its canons during a naval exercise off the coast of Israel.
Israel’s Defense Ministry on Sunday announced a series of deals for the purchase of combat systems from local defense industries in the amount of $420 million by the end of this year. This is part of a project to acquire warships whose mission would to protect natural gas platforms within Israel’s “economic waters” in the Mediterranean against military threats.
An Israeli soldier training in Krav Maga.
Several dozen members of the Indian military are currently learning how to protect themselves using the Israeli martial art of Krav Maga, India Today reported this weekend.
“I brought Krav Maga to India in year 2002 after intensive training in Israel,” Vikram Kapoor — the head instructor at the International Krav Maga Federation — was quoted as saying. “This is the only self-defense technique that is being evolved every moment and that is why it is the best.”
Culminating a three-year process, delegates at the Mennonite Church USA assembly in Orlando on Thursday adopted a resolution titled “Seeking Peace in Israel and Palestine,” with approximately 98 percent voting in favor. The resolution calls on members to “avoid purchase of products associated with the occupation or produced in settlements in occupied territories.” It also establishes a process for the church to review its investments “for the purpose of withdrawing investments from companies that are profiting from the occupation.”
Rabbi Steven Wernick says Netanyahu recruited progressive Jews to find a compromise for the holy site; now that the PM has reneged, world Jewry won’t be silent
The fight for pluralistic prayer at the Western Wall is a battle already won by Jewry’s Conservative movement. For some 20 years, Conservative Jews have inhabited a spiritual home at Jerusalem’s contentious holy site, which they won through a series of Supreme Court cases — in a section allocated to the Davidson Archaeological
Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron. (Photo credit: hebron.com)
In a secret ballot held at the World Heritage Committee’s 41st annual summit in Krakow Poland, on Friday, UNESCO voted twelve to three in favor declaring the Holy City of Hebron and the Cave of the Patriarchs “Palestinian world heritage sites”.
The resolution described a Muslim history of the city while blatantly ignoring the Biblical narrative describing 3,000 years of Jewish connection to the site. Six countries abstained from the controversial vote which, at the request of Poland, Croatia, and Jamaica, was a secret ballot; a first for such a vote.
During last month’s 2017 Chicago Dyke March, the true face of “inclusion” among “progressives” finally surfaced. According to the Chicago based newspaper Windy City Times, the march proceeded calmly with people “of all races, genders and gender identities” attending, until “the Dyke March Collective ejected three people carrying Jewish Pride flags (a rainbow flag with a Star of David in the center).”
Something is terribly broken in the relationship between American and Israeli Jews. I say this as an American Jew who has lived in Israel for almost half a century. But if anyone thinks this started with Women of the Wall or PM Netanyahu’s recent – and I believe unfortunate – backtracking on the agreement over egalitarian prayer space at the Kotel, he is suffering from selective memory, if not total denial.
gentleman from times gone by. He was soft-spoken, courtly, and wore his pants hoisted high and held up by suspenders; clearly, a European who had personally endured horrors in the last century.
Indeed, he had personally survived the Holocaust in Poland. Therefore, I could not immediately understand why he now attends a very left-wing synagogue—but, totally incomprehensible, was his unexpected and rather passionate defense of Poland and of the Poles. He argued on their behalf as if his very life still depended upon it.
Indian prime minister Narendra Modi’s decision to visit Jerusalem but not Ramallah has prompted much comment.
The expectation of equal treatment goes back to the Oslo Accords’ signing in Sep. 1993, when the prime minister of Israel, Yitzhak Rabin, represented his government in the handshake with Yasir Arafat, the much-despised chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization. No one found it strange or inappropriate at the time but things look differently nearly a quarter century later.
Matthew Healy at the Atlantic, one of the few remaining liberal anti-censorship magazines, offers a disingenuous counterpoint to the debate over political correctness.
The attempts to silence dissenting points of view are counter-speech, according to Healy. And counter-speech is an important form of free expression.