Solidarity activists hold a banner reading “Boycott Israel” during a protest in front of the Norwegian Parliament building, Stortinget, Oslo, March 30, 2015. (Ryan Rodrick Beiler / Shutterstock.com)
Norway has joined Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland and the Netherlands in contributing funds to an organization funding NGOs that promote a boycott of the Jewish state, the watchdog group NGO Monitor reports.
The Norwegian Foreign Ministry’s website indicates that more than $600,000 has been allocated to the Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law (HR/IHL) Secretariat in the second half of 2016. Half of the promised money has already been paid. The HR/IHL has given more than half of its operating budget to NGOs supporting the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement in recent years.
“We do not know what the Norwegian government knows or doesn’t know, or which part of the government made this decision,” Prof. Gerald Steinberg, president of NGO Monitor, told JNS.org.
“The objectives stipulated in the Norwegian agreement — promoting gender equality, good governance and democratization — are entirely disconnected to the realities of the HR/IHL framework. None of these terms applies to the activities of BDS grantees,” Steinberg said in a separate statement.
NGO Monitor previously reported that Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland and the Netherlands have been jointly funding Israeli and Palestinian NGO groups through the HR/IHL. According to the Secretariat’s website, the program’s objective is to “contribute to the effective realization of adherence to human rights and international humanitarian law in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) and to influence the behavior of the relevant duty bearers, including Israel, the Palestinian Authority and the governing bodies/authorities in Gaza.”
The HR/IHL, whose three-year budget for 2014-2016 is $17.6 million, also works “with and supports Palestinian and Israeli human rights (HR) civil society organizations (CSOs) active in the oPt, within the general parameters and context of ending the Israeli occupation of the oPt, and establishing an independent, democratic Palestinian state in which human rights are respected.”
Out of 24 groups receiving funds, 13 of those supported BDS and received $5.78 million in the past four years, over half of the organization’s operating budget of $10.38 million in the past four years.
These groups are at the forefront of campaigns to boycott and demonize Israel, as well as international lobbying efforts against Israel and legal campaigns to get Israelis prosecuted by the International Criminal Court (ICC), according to the NGO Monitor.
One of these funded groups, BADIL, states it’s “fully committed to BDS” and it rejects the “current proposed settlements such as the Roadmap for Peace and the Arab Peace Initiative.” It also calls for the elimination of Israel.
Another group, the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR), leads legal campaigns against Israel and has tried to have Israelis arrested abroad. It accuses Israel of “ethnic cleansing, war crimes,” and the “Judaization of Jerusalem.”
A third group, Stop the Wall, claims that Israel’s security wall is “an integral part of the racist ambitions of Zionism,” and accuses Israel of having “occupation, colonialism and apartheid” policies. Yet another group, Addameer, was co-founded by Adul-latif Ghaith, who was barred by Israel from traveling internationally due to membership in the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP).
Infographic featuring images published by the NGO BADIL, which is funded by the HR/IHL. (NGO Monitor)
In June, 41 members of the Swiss parliament signed a motion questioning the country’s funding of the HR/IHL. The Dutch government has also passed a resolution calling for a review of its funding of the Secretariat due to its support for BDS.
A spokesperson for the Norwegian embassy in Tel Aviv, however, told JNS.org that Norway does “not agree with NGO Monitor’s opinion of the organizations that are, or have been, receiving Norwegian financial support. We do not find their characterizations to be representative of the work that these organizations are doing.
“Norway’s cooperation with Israeli and Palestinian NGOs is based on a goal of a two-state solution, which we believe will benefit Israelis and Palestinians. The organizations that Norway supports, both on the Israeli and the Palestinian side, are chosen because they are well-known and respected,” the spokesperson said.
He added that Norway does not tolerate hate speech, efforts to delegitimize Israel, or anti-Semitism, nor does it provide financial support to organizations that promote BDS.
NGO Monitor’s Steinberg told JNS.org that “formally, (Norwegian) funds are designated by the Foreign Ministry, but NORAD — the Norwegian Aid and Development framework — is in charge of funding decisions for NGOs.”
“Whether anyone did due diligence on the HR/IHL Secretariat remains to be seen,” he said.
Meanwhile, in Israel, Likud MK Amir Ohana is spearheading new legislation that will seek to reduce the number of young Israelis who perform required national service with left-wing NGOs funded primarily by foreign governments. This bill joins the “NGO law,” passed by the Israeli Knesset in July, which required such NGOs to publicly report their funding sources.
“Something is wrong with the immune system of the state of Israel,” Ohana said, according to Haaretz.
Read more at http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/75007/norway-gives-money-group-funding-bds-campaigns/#4kwfYCJVZcyI6HG3.99
A Sa’ar 4.5-class Corvette of the Israeli Navy fires its canons during a naval exercise off the coast of Israel.
Israel’s Defense Ministry on Sunday announced a series of deals for the purchase of combat systems from local defense industries in the amount of $420 million by the end of this year. This is part of a project to acquire warships whose mission would to protect natural gas platforms within Israel’s “economic waters” in the Mediterranean against military threats.
An Israeli soldier training in Krav Maga.
Several dozen members of the Indian military are currently learning how to protect themselves using the Israeli martial art of Krav Maga, India Today reported this weekend.
“I brought Krav Maga to India in year 2002 after intensive training in Israel,” Vikram Kapoor — the head instructor at the International Krav Maga Federation — was quoted as saying. “This is the only self-defense technique that is being evolved every moment and that is why it is the best.”
Culminating a three-year process, delegates at the Mennonite Church USA assembly in Orlando on Thursday adopted a resolution titled “Seeking Peace in Israel and Palestine,” with approximately 98 percent voting in favor. The resolution calls on members to “avoid purchase of products associated with the occupation or produced in settlements in occupied territories.” It also establishes a process for the church to review its investments “for the purpose of withdrawing investments from companies that are profiting from the occupation.”
Rabbi Steven Wernick says Netanyahu recruited progressive Jews to find a compromise for the holy site; now that the PM has reneged, world Jewry won’t be silent
The fight for pluralistic prayer at the Western Wall is a battle already won by Jewry’s Conservative movement. For some 20 years, Conservative Jews have inhabited a spiritual home at Jerusalem’s contentious holy site, which they won through a series of Supreme Court cases — in a section allocated to the Davidson Archaeological
Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron. (Photo credit: hebron.com)
In a secret ballot held at the World Heritage Committee’s 41st annual summit in Krakow Poland, on Friday, UNESCO voted twelve to three in favor declaring the Holy City of Hebron and the Cave of the Patriarchs “Palestinian world heritage sites”.
The resolution described a Muslim history of the city while blatantly ignoring the Biblical narrative describing 3,000 years of Jewish connection to the site. Six countries abstained from the controversial vote which, at the request of Poland, Croatia, and Jamaica, was a secret ballot; a first for such a vote.
During last month’s 2017 Chicago Dyke March, the true face of “inclusion” among “progressives” finally surfaced. According to the Chicago based newspaper Windy City Times, the march proceeded calmly with people “of all races, genders and gender identities” attending, until “the Dyke March Collective ejected three people carrying Jewish Pride flags (a rainbow flag with a Star of David in the center).”
Something is terribly broken in the relationship between American and Israeli Jews. I say this as an American Jew who has lived in Israel for almost half a century. But if anyone thinks this started with Women of the Wall or PM Netanyahu’s recent – and I believe unfortunate – backtracking on the agreement over egalitarian prayer space at the Kotel, he is suffering from selective memory, if not total denial.
gentleman from times gone by. He was soft-spoken, courtly, and wore his pants hoisted high and held up by suspenders; clearly, a European who had personally endured horrors in the last century.
Indeed, he had personally survived the Holocaust in Poland. Therefore, I could not immediately understand why he now attends a very left-wing synagogue—but, totally incomprehensible, was his unexpected and rather passionate defense of Poland and of the Poles. He argued on their behalf as if his very life still depended upon it.
Indian prime minister Narendra Modi’s decision to visit Jerusalem but not Ramallah has prompted much comment.
The expectation of equal treatment goes back to the Oslo Accords’ signing in Sep. 1993, when the prime minister of Israel, Yitzhak Rabin, represented his government in the handshake with Yasir Arafat, the much-despised chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization. No one found it strange or inappropriate at the time but things look differently nearly a quarter century later.
Matthew Healy at the Atlantic, one of the few remaining liberal anti-censorship magazines, offers a disingenuous counterpoint to the debate over political correctness.
The attempts to silence dissenting points of view are counter-speech, according to Healy. And counter-speech is an important form of free expression.