In light of the current discussions on the draft law, voices are heard regarding the transition to a professional army model. This move will nullify the principle of the “People’s Army” on which David Ben-Gurion relies and may even sabotage the IDF’s human advantage, ensure suitable conditions for those recruited for meaningful service and open a wide door to civil service
In the background of the discussion in the draft law, voices are heard regarding the need to switch to an army model on a voluntary-professional basis, while revoking the draft law. With the establishment of the IDF, Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion outlined the principle of “the people’s army,” according to which enlistment in the army would apply to all of them, because the IDF is a full partner in the process of nation-building. Thus, in the spirit of Ben-Gurion’s vision, the army, in addition to its role as protector of the people and the state, joined other roles such as immigrant absorption, education in the ma’abarot, development of settlements and strengthening weakened populations.
After the War of Independence, the army was required to prepare for the “second round” while reducing the number of regular personnel. In order to combine the need for a large military force with the ability to maintain such power in a country that was just born, the reserve army was established as the national crushing force. A compulsory service is compulsory for all (apparently), in the course of which the servants remain part of the reserve army and are called to service as necessary.
Despite the will of the founding fathers, the burden has never been equal. There were those who contributed to the security of the country and there were those who watched from the sidelines. Over the years, there has been a discourse of “equality of burden”. From the voices calling for full equality, including the service of Arab citizens exempt from enlistment, to the ultra-Orthodox and the issue of “Torah art”. In recent years, in light of the accuracy of the draft law, the issue was again raised with the claim that the model of the people’s army is irrelevant and that the IDF must become a professional army as in many Western countries
The burden has never been egalitarian (Photo: Reuters)
First, the fact that the IDF enjoys the pool of brains and capabilities of the entire Israeli society at its disposal is part of the power multiplier that enables it to have the human advantage – both in terms of command and technology. At the same time, it is necessary to preserve this human advantage. Experience shows that conscripts to professional armies are not the first rank of the company. If the service is not perceived as an important and central value, it directly affects the willingness to serve.
In addition, the regular army, and no less than the reserves, constitute a unifying factor and a “melting pot” for Israeli society. The IDF was the place where different populations met and worked together to get to know each other and create a common and unifying reality, all of which would be lost if the principle of “the people’s army” was played and replaced by a professional army.
It is possible to characterize three main principles that will help continue the model of the people’s army, including the need to share in the duties and actions of all segments of the population, the need to honor the servants, with an emphasis on combatants.
An advantage for recruits for combat service
True, not everyone is able or suitable to serve in the IDF, especially since the expected increase in the recruitment cycle creates a load of manpower required for the IDF in the coming years. The national service will be able to provide a response to these populations, and the principle will be simple: The IDF first chooses those who enlist in its services according to its needs, while the others, including Haredim and Arabs, will be recruited for civilian service. Schools, hospitals and nursing homes and a variety of activities that contribute to the community and society.
There should be a significant and visible difference between those who served in the national or civilian form or in the rear positions in the IDF, and those who served as fighters or supporters fighting.
Combatants and combat supporters should be rewarded (Photo: IDF Spokesperson)
There will be no room for any claims of discrimination or discrimination, since the door is open to everyone for combat service and in accordance with receiving compensation and improved conditions within and after the service, as is happening partially today.
It can be assumed that not everyone will immediately adopt this proposal, but we believe that the three principles set forth are correct, worthy and can serve as a basis for agreement between all the Zionist parties in the coalition and in the opposition. After the principles and rules are finalized, it will be possible to argue over the details: What national service? Who will approve the content? What is meaningful service? As well as the ranking among the employees in the various units.
In conclusion, we have the opportunity to bring about change, to narrow gaps and indeed to advance the principle of “equality of burden” while preserving the people’s army.
The column was written by Dr. and Col. (res.) Gabi Siboni, and Colonel (res.) Erez Wiener, the military commentator for Channel 20
BDS movement founder Omar Barghouti (YouTube)
Omar Barghouti, founder and leader of the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, was denied entry to the United States on Wednesday.
He was informed by airline staff at Ben-Gurion International Airport in Israel that U.S. immigration officials told the American consul in Tel Aviv to block him from boarding the flight.
A State Department official told NPR, “Visa records are confidential under U.S. law; therefore, we cannot discuss the details of individual visa cases.”
The US Capitol Building. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.
Four of Israel’s most dedicated supporters in the US Congress on Friday expressed concern that the Jewish state may annex the West Bank, as results from Israel’s election earlier this week confirmed the likelihood of a right-wing government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
“As strong, life-long supporters of Israel, a U.S.-Israel relationship rooted in our shared values, and the two-state solution, we are greatly concerned by the possibility of Israel taking unilateral steps to annex the West Bank,” said a joint statement from Democratic representatives Eliot Engel (NY), Chair of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs,
The final image sent by Israeli spacecraft Beresheet before it crash-landed on the moon. Photo: courtesy of Space IL.
Astronauts and scientists at the US space agency NASA commended the Israeli non-profit organization SpaceIL for its efforts afyer its spacecraft “Beresheet” failed to land safely on the moon on Thursday.
NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine said, “While NASA regrets the end of the SpaceIL mission without a successful lunar landing of the Beresheet lander, we congratulate SpaceIL, the Israel Aerospace Industries and the state of Israel on the incredible accomplishment of sending the first privately funded mission into lunar orbit.”
“Der ewige Jude” – “Theeternal Jew” movie poster . (photo credit: WIKIPEDIA)
The lead article Thursday on the opinion page of the Frankfurter Rundschau newspaper compared Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with the 1940 Nazi antisemitic movie The Eternal Jew.
The article was titled in the paper “The Eternal Netanyahu” in a word play in connection with director Fritz Hippler’s antisemitic pseudo-documentary, based on the medieval legend of the wandering Jew, that served as a cinematographic justification for the Holocaust.
Mar 31, 2019 0Last week, in his speech at the AIPAC policy conference, said President Juan Orlando Hernández of Honduras that he would open a commercial office in Jerusalem – but not an embassy. U.S....
As an orthopedic surgeon for 30 years in Washington, D.C. I see patients from all over the world and from every walk of life and what has become clear to me is that everyone is fundamentally the same. As a rule, I shy away from political or religious discussions with my patients as they have no bearing on their care. But occasionally, the discussions are thrust on me.
Several years ago I treated a professor of political science from a local university and had established a good rapport with him. On his last visit before saying goodbye he popped a question.
It is well-known by some and wholly ignored by others that Islam has a long, sad history of antisemitism, a bigotry that originated in the seventh century CE (the first Islamic century) and has grown more vicious in the 21st. Combined with an almost universal anti-Zionism and bolstered by many on the political “left”, it is today the most ubiquitous and deadliest form of Jew-hatred. It takes the form, not just of insults, boycotts, and lawfare, but of wars, terrorist attacks, and calls for the destruction of the Jewish state and the genocide of the Jews.
Amman – The streets in Amman’s Jebel al-Weibdeh are crowded in the early evening with sounds of young people looking for a place to relax. Coffee shops intermix with art studios selling crafts for tourists. At the Maestro bar and restaurant, a band is getting ready for a live performance. The lights are dimmed and someone has put “no smoking” signs on the tables – they are out of place with the ash trays. Apparently, Monday has jam sessions and anyone can bring their instrument to join in. But it’s Wednesday.
A few of my readers recently asked me to explain the difference between “Palestinians” living inside and outside of Israel’s borders. Who are the “Palestinians” anyway? First, see below:
“Palestine” does not exist today as a nation-state, but at multiple times in history, including the present, it has been one of the names of a place. The Romans, recalling the defunct Philistines – non-Arab Sea People – coined it after defeating [Jewish general] Bar Kochba in 135 CE to disassociate what had been Judaea from Jews.
President Trump’s peace plan for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict surfaced two years ago and to this day – remarkably – only he and a handful of aides know its precise details. A stream of leaks, however, contains enough internal consistency that their collation, supplemented by conversations with administration officials, provides a plausible outline of the plan’s contents.
On March 31, a South Bend grandma brought her grandson to the hospital. The 11-month-old baby boy had been shot. His grandmother’s car had also taken fire. It was another early morning in South Bend.
Around the same time, Mayor Buttigieg, was toting up the $7 million in donations from his charm offensive as his bid for the 2020 Democrat nomination got underway. The national media never bothered reporting the shooting of an 11-month-old boy in the city he was supposed to be running, but instead confined its coverage of South Bend matters to a publicity stunt wedding officiated by Buttigieg.
The Palestinian students are being targeted because of their political affiliations and not because of any crime they committed.
While the Palestinian Authority and Hamas are busy beating up each other’s supporters, “pro-Palestinian” activists on US and Canadian university campuses are busy blaming Israel for Palestinian woes.
As an American Christian who has had the privilege of working in senior-level positions for four US presidents and who has enjoyed a close association with three of Israel’s prime ministers, I believe it is my obligation to provide the Israeli people with my views. I think my viewpoint is important because a vast number of American Evangelical Christians believe as I believe. In addition, Evangelical Christians are, without question, Israel’s strongest supporters in the United States.
Does Case 3000 – known as the submarine affair – prove that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is guilty of doing something illegal? Well, all Likud supporters believe with absolute confidence that it’s a political plot. Netanyahu’s opponents, however, believe – also with absolute confidence – that it’s the largest corruption case to ever occur in the State of Israel.